Tony Davis Tony Davis's Profile Page

Tony Davis Tony Davis

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한공부문제, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor합격보장가능덤프문제

ITDumpsKR연구한 전문PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험을 겨냥한 덤프가 아주 많은 인기를 누리고 있습니다. ITDumpsKR제공되는 자료는 지식을 장악할 수 있는 반면 많은 경험도 쌓을 수 있습니다. ITDumpsKR는 많은 IT인사들의 요구를 만족시켜드릴 수 있는 사이트입니다. 비록PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험은 어렵지만 우리ITDumpsKR의 문제집으로 가이드 하면 여러분은 아주 자신만만하게 응시하실 수 있습니다. 안심하시고 우리 ITDumpsKR가 제공하는 알맞춤 문제집을 사용하시고 완벽한PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험 준비를 하세요.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험은 지식과 기술이 높은 수준을 요구하는 엄격하고 도전적인 시험입니다. 후보자는 정보 보안 관리 원칙과 실천 방법에 대한 견고한 이해와 감사를 수행하고 조직의 정보 보안 관리 체계를 관리하는 경험을 가져야합니다. 시험은 객관식 문제로 이루어져 있으며 후보자는 최소 70%의 점수를 획득하여 통과해야합니다.

>> PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한 공부문제 <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프문제 & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험

ITDumpsKR에서는 IT인증시험에 관한 모든 덤프를 제공해드립니다. 우선 시험센터에서 정확한 시험코드를 확인하시고 그 코드와 동일한 코드로 되어있는 덤프를 구매하셔서 덤프에 있는 문제와 답을 기억하시면 시험을 쉽게 패스하실수 있습니다.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험은 IT인증시험중에서 많은 인기를 가지고 있는 시험입니다.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하시면 취업이나 승진에 많은 가산점이 되어드릴것입니다.

최신 ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 무료샘플문제 (Q63-Q68):

질문 # 63
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to verify that the Statement of Applicability (SoA) contains the necessary controls.
You review the latest SoA (version 5) document, sampling the access control to the source code (A.8.4), and want to know how the organisation secures ABC's healthcare mobile app source code received from an outsourced software developer.
The IT Security Manager explains the received source code will be checked into the SCM system to make sure of its integrity and security. Only authorised users will be able to check out the software to update it. Both check-in and check-out activities will be logged by the system automatically. The version control is managed by the system automatically.
You found a total of 10 user accounts on the SCM. All of them are from the IT department. You further check with the Human Resource manager and confirm that one of the users, Scott, resigned 9 months ago. The SCM System Administrator confirmed Scott's last check-out of the source code was found 1 month ago. He was using one of the authorised desktops from the local network in a secure area.
You check the user de-registration procedure which states "Managers have to make sure of deregistration of the user account and authorisation immediately from the relevant ICT system and/or equipment after resignation approval." There was no deregistration record for user Scott.
The IT Security Manager explains that Scott is a very good software engineer, an ex-colleague, and a friend.
He still comes back to the office every month after he resigned to provide support on source code maintenance. That's why his account on SCM still exists. "We know Scott well and he passed all our background checks when he joined us. As such we didn't feel it necessary to agree any further information security requirements with him just because he is now an external provider".
You prepare the audit findings. Select the three correct options.

A. There is a nonconformity (NC). The SCM is open-source system software. It is not secured and cannot be used for access and version control of the source code. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.8.4.
B. There is a nonconformity (NC). Scott should have been advised of applicable information security requirements relevant to his new relationship (external provider) with the nursing home. The IT security manager has however confirmed that this did not take place. This does not conform with control A.5.20.
C. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation has failed to identify the security risks associated with leaving Scott's account open when he was only re-engaged for a short period monthly. This does not conform with clause 8.2.
D. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation does not have a documented procedure setting out the use of systematic tools to provide access and version control of the source code. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.8.4.
E. There is a nonconformity (NC). The SCM will log the source code check-in/-out activities automatically. If something goes wrong, the team might not be able to trace it. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.8.4.
F. There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Security manager did not make sure the user account for Scott was removed from the SCM and did not complete the user deregistration process after the resignation.
This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.5.15.
G. There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation's access control arrangements are not operating effectively as an individual who is no longer employed by the organisation is being permitted to access the nursing home's ICT systems. This does not conform with control A.5.15.
H. There is a nonconformity (NC). The operating procedures are not well documented. This prevented the SCM System Administrator from being able to remove a user account immediately. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.5.37.

정답：C,F,G

설명：
The correct options are:
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation's access control arrangements are not operating effectively as an individual who is no longer employed by the organisation is being permitted to access the nursing home's ICT systems. This does not conform with control A.5.15. (B): This option is correct because control A.5.15 requires the organization to implement secure log-on procedures and manage user access rights. The organization should ensure that only authorized users can access the ICT systems and that the access rights are revoked or modified when the user status changes. The fact that Scott, who resigned 9 months ago, still has an active account on the SCM and can check out the source code, indicates a failure of the access control arrangements and a nonconformity with the control A.5.15.
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Security manager did not make sure the user account for Scott was removed from the SCM and did not complete the user deregistration process after the resignation. This does not conform with clause 9.1 and control A.5.15. : This option is correct because clause 9.1 requires the organization to monitor, measure, analyze, and evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS. The organization should have processes and indicators to verify that the ISMS requirements and objectives are met and that the ISMS is continually improved. The organization should also ensure that the results of the monitoring and measurement are documented and communicated. The fact that the IT Security manager did not follow the user de-registration procedure and did not document or communicate the exception for Scott, indicates a failure of the monitoring and measurement processes and a nonconformity with clause 9.1 and control A.5.15.
* There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation has failed to identify the security risks associated with leaving Scott's account open when he was only re-engaged for a short period monthly. This does not conform with clause 8.2. (F): This option is correct because clause 8.2 requires the organization to establish and maintain an information security risk management process. The organization should identify the information security risks, analyze and evaluate the risks, and treat the risks according to the risk criteria and the risk treatment options. The organization should also monitor and review the risks and the risk treatment plan periodically and document the results. The fact that the organization did not identify the security risks associated with Scott's access to the SCM and the source code, such as unauthorized disclosure, modification, or deletion of the information, indicates a failure of the risk management process and a nonconformity with clause 8.2.

질문 # 64
The data center at which you work is currently seeking ISO/IEC27001:2022 certification. In preparation for your initial certification visit a number of internal audits have been carried out by a colleague working at another data centre within your Group. They secured their ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate earlier in the year.
You have just qualified as an Internal ISMS auditor and your manager has asked you to review the audit process and audit findings as a final check before the external Certrfication Body arrives.
Which six of the following would cause you concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements?

A. The audit programme does not reference audit methods or audit responsibilities
B. Audit reports are not held in hardcopy (i.e. on paper). They are only stored as ".POF documents on the organisation's intranet
C. The audit process states the results of audits will be made available to 'relevant' managers, not top management
D. Top management commitment to the ISMS will not be audited before the certification visit, according to the audit programme
E. The audit programme does not take into account the results of previous audits
F. The audit programme does not take into account the relative importance of information security processes
G. Although the scope for each internal audit has been defined, there are no audit criteria defined for the audits carried out to date
H. The audit programme mandates auditors must be independent of the areas they audit in order to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022
I. Audit reports to date have used key performance indicator information to focus solely on the efficiency of ISMS processes
J. The audit programme shows management reviews taking place at irregular intervals during the year

정답：D,E,F,G,I,J

설명：
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 9.3 requires top management to review the organization's ISMS at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness1. Clause 9.2 requires the organization to conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the ISMS conforms to its own requirements and those of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained1. Therefore, when reviewing the audit process and audit findings as a final check before the external certification body arrives, an internal ISMS auditor should verify that these clauses are met in accordance with the audit criteria.
Six of the following statements would cause concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements:
* The audit programme shows management reviews taking place at irregular intervals during the year:
This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not conducting management reviews at planned intervals, as required by clause 9.3. This may affect the ability of top management to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the ISMS.
* The audit programme does not take into account the relative importance of information security processes: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not applying a risk-based approach to determine the audit frequency, methods, scope and criteria, as recommended by ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems2. This may affect the ability of the organization to identify and address the most significant risks and opportunities for its ISMS.
* Although the scope for each internal audit has been defined, there are no audit criteria defined for the audits carried out to date: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not establishing audit criteria for each internal audit, as required by clause 9.2. Audit criteria are the set of policies, procedures or requirements used as a reference against which audit evidence is compared2.
Without audit criteria, it is not possible to determine whether the ISMS conforms to its own requirements and those of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* Audit reports to date have used key performance indicator information to focus solely on the efficiency of ISMS processes: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not evaluating the effectiveness of ISMS processes, as required by clause 9.1. Effectiveness is the extent to which planned activities are realized and planned results achieved2. Efficiency is the relationship between the result achieved and the resources used2. Both aspects are important for measuring and evaluating ISMS performance and improvement.
* The audit programme does not take into account the results of previous audits: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not using the results of previous audits as an input for planning and conducting subsequent audits, as recommended by ISO 19011:20182. This may affect the ability of the organization to identify and address any recurring or unresolved issues or nonconformities related to its ISMS.
* Top management commitment to the ISMS will not be audited before the certification visit, according to the audit programme: This statement would cause concern because it implies that the organization is not verifying that top management demonstrates leadership and commitment with respect to its ISMS, as required by clause 5.1. This may affect the ability of top management to ensure that the ISMS policy and objectives are established and compatible with the strategic direction of the organization; that roles, responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles are assigned and communicated; that resources needed for the ISMS are available; that communication about information security matters is established; that continual improvement of the ISMS is promoted; that other relevant management reviews are aligned with those of information security; and that support is provided to other relevant roles1.
The other statements would not cause concern in respect of conformity to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements:
* Audit reports are not held in hardcopy (i.e. on paper). They are only stored as ".POF documents on the organisation's intranet: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific format or media for documenting or storing audit reports, as long as they are controlled according to clause 7.5.
* The audit programme mandates auditors must be independent of the areas they audit in order to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for auditor independence, as long as the audit is conducted objectively and impartially, in accordance with ISO 19011:20182.
* The audit programme does not reference audit methods or audit responsibilities: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for referencing audit methods or audit responsibilities in the audit programme, as long as they are defined and documented according to ISO 19011:20182.
* The audit process states the results of audits will be made available to 'relevant' managers, not top management: This statement would not cause concern because it does not imply any nonconformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requirements. The standard does not prescribe any specific requirement for communicating the results of audits to top management, as long as they are reported to the relevant parties and used as an input for management review, according to clause 9.3.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

질문 # 65

정답：

설명：

Explanation:
An audit finding is the result of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against audit criteria.

질문 # 66
You are an audit team leader conducting a third-party surveillance audit of a telecom services provider. You have assigned responsibility for auditing the organisation's information security objectives to a junior member of your audit team. Before they begin their assessment, you ask them the following question to check their understanding of the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Which four of the following criteria must Information security objectives fulfil?

A. They must be reviewed annually
B. They must always be measured
C. They must be consistent with the IS Policy
D. They must be achievable
E. They must be available as documented information
F. They must be communicated appropriately
G. They must always be monitored
H. They must be clear and unambiguous

정답：C,D,E,F

설명：
Explanation
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.2, information security objectives are the specific results that an organisation intends to achieve with its information security management system (ISMS). The standard specifies that information security objectives must fulfil the following criteria:
* They must be communicated appropriately (A): The organisation must ensure that the relevant internal and external parties are informed about the information security objectives and their roles and responsibilities in achieving them. This can help to create awareness, commitment, and accountability for information security. This criterion is related to clause 6.2.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* They must be available as documented information (B): The organisation must maintain and retain documented information on the information security objectives, including their scope, level, indicators, and time frame. This can help to provide evidence, traceability, and consistency for information security. This criterion is related to clause 6.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
* They must be consistent with the IS Policy (G): The organisation must ensure that the information security objectives are aligned with the information security policy, which is the top-level statement of the organisation's intentions and direction for information security. This can help to support the strategic objectives and the context of the organisation. This criterion is related to clause 5.2 of ISO/IEC
27001:2022.
* They must be achievable (H): The organisation must ensure that the information security objectives are realistic and attainable, considering the available resources, capabilities, and constraints. This can help to avoid setting unrealistic or unfeasible expectations and to monitor and measure the progress and performance of information security. This criterion is related to clause 6.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements1
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor2
* ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor - PECB3
* ISO 27001:2022 certified ISMS lead auditor - Jisc4
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Transition Training Course5
* ISO 27001 - Information Security Lead Auditor Course - PwC Training Academy6

질문 # 67
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:

Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.

A. Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months
B. Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months
C. Recommend certification after your approval of the proposed corrective action plan Recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year
D. Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date
E. Recommend certification immediately

정답：C

설명：
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC
17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

질문 # 68
......

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증덤프는 실제 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험의 가장 최근 시험의 기출문제를 기준으로 하여 만들어진 최고품질을 자랑하는 최고적중율의 시험대비자료입니다. 저희 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프로 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에 도전해보지 않으실래요? ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에서 불합격 받을시 덤프비용은 환불해드리기에 부담없이 구매하셔도 됩니다.환불의 유일한 기준은 불합격 성적표이고 환불유효기간은 구매일로부터 60일까지입니다.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프문제: https://www.itdumpskr.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam.html

쉽게 시험을 통과하시려는 분께 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프를 추천해드립니다, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한 공부문제 우리는 백프로 여러분들한테 편리함과 통과 율은 보장 드립니다, 우리ITDumpsKR ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor합격보장 가능 덤프문제의 덤프를 사용한다면 우리는 일년무료 업뎃서비스를 제공하고 또 100%통과 율을 장담합니다, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한 공부문제 우리의 문제와 답들은 모두 엘리트한 전문가들이 만들어낸 만큼 시험문제의 적중률은 아주 높습니다, ITDumpsKR의 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 덤프로 시험을 준비하면PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험패스를 예약한것과 같습니다, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한 공부문제 회사일도 바쁜데 시험공부까지 스트레스가 장난아니게 싸이고 몸도 많이 상하겠죠.

관련 서류는, 난 열심히 일하는데, 저 사람은 며칠 뚝딱 일하고 놀고 있네, 쉽게 시험을 통과하시려는 분께 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프를 추천해드립니다, 우리는 백프로 여러분들한테 편리함과 통과 율은 보장 드립니다, 우리ITDumpsKR의 덤프를 사용한다면 우리는 일년무료 업뎃서비스를 제공하고 또 100%통과 율을 장담합니다.

시험패스에 유효한 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor유효한 공부문제 덤프문제

우리의 문제와 답들은 모두 엘리트한 전문가들이 만들어낸 만큼 시험문제의 적중률은 아주 높습니다, ITDumpsKR의 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 덤프로 시험을 준비하면PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험패스를 예약한것과 같습니다.

Tony Davis Tony Davis

Biography

Widas

cidaas

cnips